Llama 4 Scout vs Muse Glimmer (High)

Which is better for the money: Llama 4 Scout by Meta or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.

Trade-off

MetaLlama 4 ScoutOff the frontier

Intelligence: 6.50
Total cost: $73.6

MetaMuse Glimmer (High)Off the frontier

Intelligence: 17.50
Total cost: $146

Verdict

Depends on your budget

Muse Glimmer (High) scores 11.0 points higher (17.5 vs 6.5) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($146 vs $73.6; both mid-range class). Pick Muse Glimmer (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Llama 4 Scout.

Metric	Llama 4 Scout	Muse Glimmer (High)	Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)	6.5	17.5	+169.2% Muse Glimmer (High) is 2.7× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)	$73.56	$145.77	+98.2% Muse Glimmer (High) is 98.2% more expensive
End-to-end time (lower is better)	5.00s	24.78s	+395.6% Muse Glimmer (High) is 395.6% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)	$0.18 / $0.66	$0.30 / $1.20
Input modalities	Text, Image	Text, Image

Muse Glimmer (High) vs Llama 4 Scout: 169.2% more intelligence, 98.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 395.6% slower end-to-end.

Open this matchup in the interactive picker Llama 4 Scout: what beats it Muse Glimmer (High): what beats it

Today's Pareto frontier

Against the frontier

Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.

Llama 4 ScoutMuse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model

Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill