Llama 4 Scout vs Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Llama 4 Scout by Meta or Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) scores 32.4 points higher (38.9 vs 6.5) but costs 16× as much to run the benchmark ($1185 vs $73.6; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout when 6.5 is enough.
| Metric | Llama 4 Scout | Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.5 | 38.9 | +498.5% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 6.0× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $73.56 | $1,184.90 | +1510.8% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 16× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.99s | 17.05s | +241.7% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 241.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.18 / $0.66 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) vs Llama 4 Scout: 498.5% more intelligence, 1510.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 241.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
- Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Llama 4 ScoutMuse Spark Open (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/muse-spark-open · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/muse-spark-open?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill