Llama 4 Scout vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Llama 4 Scout by Meta or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 45.9 points higher (52.4 vs 6.5) but costs 79× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $73.6; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout when 6.5 is enough.
| Metric | Llama 4 Scout | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.5 | 52.4 | +706.2% Muse Wonder (Max) is 8.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $73.56 | $5,786.78 | +7766.7% Muse Wonder (Max) is 79× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.00s | 40.70s | +714.0% Muse Wonder (Max) is 714.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.18 / $0.66 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Llama 4 Scout: 706.2% more intelligence, 7766.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 714.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Llama 4 ScoutMuse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill