LongCat 2.0 vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: LongCat 2.0 by LongCat or Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) scores 26.0 points higher (45.1 vs 19.1) but costs 3.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1655 vs $545; both premium class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 19.1, and LongCat 2.0 when 19.1 is enough.
| Metric | LongCat 2.0 | Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 19.1 | 45.1 | +136.1% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 2.4× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $544.74 | $1,655.27 | +203.9% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 3.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 35.54s | 29.94s | −15.8% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 15.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $2.95 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) vs LongCat 2.0: 136.1% more intelligence, 203.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 15.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- LongCat 2.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
LongCat 2.0Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/longcat-2-0/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/longcat-2-0/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill