LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: LongCat 2.0 by LongCat or Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick LongCat 2.0
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) vs LongCat 2.0: 18.3% less intelligence, 21.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 43.3% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | LongCat 2.0 | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 19.1 | 15.6 | −18.3% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 18.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $544.74 | $661.29 | +21.4% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 21.4% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 37.40s | 21.22s | −43.3% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 43.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $2.95 | $0.40 / $3.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- LongCat 2.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
LongCat 2.0Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/longcat-2-0/qwen3-5-122b-a10b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/longcat-2-0/qwen3-5-122b-a10b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill