Mercury 2.5 vs MiMo-V2.5
Which is better for the money: Mercury 2.5 by Inception or MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 vs Mercury 2.5: 77.2% more intelligence, 71.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 850.6% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Mercury 2.5 | MiMo-V2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.3 | 21.8 | +77.2% MiMo-V2.5 is 77.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $218.11 | $61.93 | −71.6% MiMo-V2.5 is 71.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.39s | 41.73s | +850.6% MiMo-V2.5 is 850.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $0.75 | $0.13 / $0.27 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mercury 2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
Mercury 2.5MiMo-V2.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mercury-2-5/mimo-v2-5-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mercury-2-5/mimo-v2-5-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill