Mercury 2.5 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Mercury 2.5 by Inception or MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) scores 13.7 points higher (26.0 vs 12.3) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($231 vs $218; both mid-range class). Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Mercury 2.5.
| Metric | Mercury 2.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.3 | 26.0 | +111.4% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 2.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $218.11 | $231.08 | +5.9% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 5.9% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.32s | 49.58s | +1047.7% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 1047.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $0.75 | $0.41 / $1.02 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Mercury 2.5: 111.4% more intelligence, 5.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1047.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mercury 2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Mercury 2.5MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mercury-2-5/mimo-v2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mercury-2-5/mimo-v2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill