MiMo-V2.5 vs Mistral Large 4 Preview
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi or Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 Preview scores 16.6 points higher (38.4 vs 21.8) but costs 26× as much to run the benchmark ($1608 vs $61.9; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Large 4 Preview when you need intelligence above 21.8, and MiMo-V2.5 when 21.8 is enough.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5 | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.8 | 38.4 | +76.1% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 76.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $61.93 | $1,607.86 | +2496.3% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 26× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 45.39s | 25.73s | −43.3% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 43.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.13 / $0.27 | $1.36 / $4.18 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 Preview vs MiMo-V2.5: 76.1% more intelligence, 2496.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 43.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
MiMo-V2.5Mistral Large 4 PreviewToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/mistral-large-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/mistral-large-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill