MiMo-V2.5 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.5 scores 12.9 points higher (21.8 vs 8.9) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($66.1 vs $63.7; both mid-range class). Pick MiMo-V2.5 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoni….
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5 | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.8 | 8.9 | −59.2% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 59.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $66.09 | $63.74 | −3.6% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 3.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 66.43s | 10.12s | −84.8% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 84.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.13 / $0.27 | $0.05 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) vs MiMo-V2.5: 59.2% less intelligence, 3.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 84.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
MiMo-V2.5NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill