MiMo-V2.5 vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)

MiMo-V2.5 vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

XiaomiMiMo-V2.5On the open-weights frontier
Intelligence
21.80
Total cost
$61.9
Multiverse ComputingQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricMiMo-V2.5Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)21.826.7+22.5% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 22.5% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$61.93Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)41.73s15.88s−61.9% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 61.9% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.13 / $0.27$0.11 / $0.33
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerMiMo-V2.5: what beats itQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/quasar-438b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/quasar-438b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill