MiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-23.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5
Qwen3 Coder Next vs MiMo-V2.5: 57.8% less intelligence, 850.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 91.3% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.8 | 9.2 | −57.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 57.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $42.61 | $405.10 | +850.7% Qwen3 Coder Next is 9.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 84.54s | 7.37s | −91.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 91.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
MiMo-V2.5Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill