MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Ministral 3 8B
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi or Ministral 3 8B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) scores 20.5 points higher (26.0 vs 5.5) but costs 8.4× as much to run the benchmark ($231 vs $27.5; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) when you need intelligence above 5.5, and Ministral 3 8B when 5.5 is enough.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Ministral 3 8B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.0 | 5.5 | −78.8% Ministral 3 8B is 78.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $231.08 | $27.47 | −88.1% Ministral 3 8B is 88.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.53s | 4.96s | −90.0% Ministral 3 8B is 90.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.41 / $1.02 | $0.15 / $0.15 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 8B vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning): 78.8% less intelligence, 88.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 90.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Ministral 3 8B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Ministral 3 8BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/ministral-3-8b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/ministral-3-8b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill