MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi or Mistral Medium 3.5 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning): 45.4% less intelligence, 446.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 63.6% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.0 | 14.2 | −45.4% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 45.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $231.08 | $1,263.80 | +446.9% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 5.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.36s | 17.96s | −63.6% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 63.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.41 / $1.02 | $1.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Mistral Medium 3.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/mistral-medium-3-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/mistral-medium-3-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill