MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Mistral Small 3.2
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi or Mistral Small 3.2 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) scores 19.0 points higher (26.0 vs 7.0) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($231 vs $122; both mid-range class). Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Mistral Small 3.2.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Mistral Small 3.2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.0 | 7.0 | −73.1% Mistral Small 3.2 is 73.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $231.08 | $121.78 | −47.3% Mistral Small 3.2 is 47.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.36s | 12.50s | −74.7% Mistral Small 3.2 is 74.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.41 / $1.02 | $0.07 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Mistral Small 3.2 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning): 73.1% less intelligence, 47.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 74.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Mistral Small 3.2Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/mistral-small-3-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/mistral-small-3-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill