MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) scores 13.1 points higher (26.0 vs 12.9) but costs 2.5× as much to run the benchmark ($231 vs $92.8; both mid-range class). Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Nemotron 3.5 Lightning.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.0 | 12.9 | −50.4% Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 50.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $231.08 | $92.76 | −59.9% Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 59.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.64s | 9.12s | −81.6% Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 81.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.41 / $1.02 | $0.06 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning): 50.4% less intelligence, 59.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 81.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Nemotron 3.5 LightningToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/nemotron-3-5-lightning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/nemotron-3-5-lightning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill