MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi or Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)
Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning): 56.9% less intelligence, 42.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 13.0% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.0 | 11.2 | −56.9% Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) is 56.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $231.08 | $328.86 | +42.3% Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) is 42.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.64s | 43.21s | −13.0% Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) is 13.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.41 / $1.02 | $0.14 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/qwen3-5-9b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/qwen3-5-9b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill