MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 8.4 points higher (46.3 vs 37.9) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($207 vs $110; both mid-range class). Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.9 | 46.3 | +22.2% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 22.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $109.55 | $206.66 | +88.6% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 88.6% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.53s | 48.29s | −2.5% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 2.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 22.2% more intelligence, 88.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 2.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
MiMo-V2.6-FlashMiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill