MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Ministral 3 14B
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi or Ministral 3 14B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 31.9 points higher (37.9 vs 6.0) but costs 2.9× as much to run the benchmark ($110 vs $37.6; mid-range vs budget cost classes). Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Ministral 3 14B.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ministral 3 14B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.9 | 6.0 | −84.2% Ministral 3 14B is 84.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $109.55 | $37.56 | −65.7% Ministral 3 14B is 65.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 53.14s | 7.71s | −85.5% Ministral 3 14B is 85.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.20 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 14B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 84.2% less intelligence, 65.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 85.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
MiMo-V2.6-FlashMinistral 3 14BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/ministral-3-14b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/ministral-3-14b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill