MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Ministral 3 3B
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi or Ministral 3 3B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 33.1 points higher (37.9 vs 4.8) but costs 9.0× as much to run the benchmark ($110 vs $12.2; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash when you need intelligence above 4.8, and Ministral 3 3B when 4.8 is enough.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ministral 3 3B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.9 | 4.8 | −87.3% Ministral 3 3B is 87.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $109.55 | $12.23 | −88.8% Ministral 3 3B is 88.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.53s | 3.07s | −93.8% Ministral 3 3B is 93.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.10 / $0.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 3B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 87.3% less intelligence, 88.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 93.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Ministral 3 3B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
MiMo-V2.6-FlashMinistral 3 3BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/ministral-3-3b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/ministral-3-3b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill