MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Muse Ember (Max)
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi or Muse Ember (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Ember (Max) scores 9.3 points higher (36.0 vs 26.7) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($117 vs $106; both mid-range class). Pick Muse Ember (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Muse Ember (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.7 | 36.0 | +34.8% Muse Ember (Max) is 34.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $106.14 | $117.12 | +10.3% Muse Ember (Max) is 10.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 67.46s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Ember (Max) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 34.8% more intelligence, 10.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Muse Ember (Xhigh) scores 34.10 for $95.7.
- Muse Ember (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
MiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Ember (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/muse-ember · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/muse-ember?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill