MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi or Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 39.6% less intelligence, 536.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 68.2% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.9 | 22.9 | −39.6% Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B… is 39.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $109.55 | $696.84 | +536.1% Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B… is 6.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 47.72s | 15.17s | −68.2% Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B… is 68.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.60 / $2.70 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
MiMo-V2.6-FlashNemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/nvidia-nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/nvidia-nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill