MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi or Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 58.8% less intelligence, 503.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 56.1% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.9 | 15.6 | −58.8% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 58.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $109.55 | $661.29 | +503.6% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 6.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.53s | 21.72s | −56.1% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 56.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.40 / $3.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
MiMo-V2.6-FlashQwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/qwen3-5-122b-a10b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/qwen3-5-122b-a10b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill