MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-17.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Beam 1.0 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 20.1% less intelligence, 575.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 75.5% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.9 | 30.3 | −20.1% Beam 1.0 is 20.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $109.55 | $739.78 | +575.3% Beam 1.0 is 6.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 54.32s | 13.31s | −75.5% Beam 1.0 is 75.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.70 / $2.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
MiMo-V2.6-FlashBeam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill