MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Solar Pro 4
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi or Solar Pro 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Solar Pro 4 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.8% less intelligence, 572.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Solar Pro 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.9 | 26.6 | −29.8% Solar Pro 4 is 29.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $109.55 | $736.82 | +572.6% Solar Pro 4 is 6.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.26s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Solar Pro 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
MiMo-V2.6-FlashSolar Pro 4Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/solar-pro4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/solar-pro4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill