MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi or Mistral Medium 3.5 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 69.3% less intelligence, 511.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 62.8% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.3 | 14.2 | −69.3% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 69.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $206.66 | $1,263.80 | +511.5% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 6.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 48.29s | 17.96s | −62.8% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 62.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $1.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
MiMo-V2.6-ProMistral Medium 3.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/mistral-medium-3-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/mistral-medium-3-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill