MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Mistral Small 3.2
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi or Mistral Small 3.2 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 39.3 points higher (46.3 vs 7.0) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($207 vs $122; both mid-range class). Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Mistral Small 3.2.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Mistral Small 3.2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.3 | 7.0 | −84.9% Mistral Small 3.2 is 84.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $206.66 | $121.78 | −41.1% Mistral Small 3.2 is 41.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 48.29s | 12.50s | −74.1% Mistral Small 3.2 is 74.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $0.07 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Mistral Small 3.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 84.9% less intelligence, 41.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 74.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
MiMo-V2.6-ProMistral Small 3.2Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/mistral-small-3-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/mistral-small-3-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill