MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) scores 1.8 points higher (48.1 vs 46.3) but costs 9.7× as much to run the benchmark ($2000 vs $207; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 46.3, and MiMo-V2.6-Pro when 46.3 is enough.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.3 | 48.1 | +3.9% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 3.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $206.66 | $2,000.35 | +867.9% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 9.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 48.29s | 84.79s | +75.6% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 75.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 3.9% more intelligence, 867.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 75.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
MiMo-V2.6-ProMuse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill