MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 33.4 points higher (46.3 vs 12.9) but costs 2.2× as much to run the benchmark ($207 vs $92.8; both mid-range class). Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Nemotron 3.5 Lightning.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.3 | 12.9 | −72.1% Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 72.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $206.66 | $92.76 | −55.1% Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 55.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 48.29s | 9.16s | −81.0% Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 81.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $0.06 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 72.1% less intelligence, 55.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 81.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
MiMo-V2.6-ProNemotron 3.5 LightningToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/nemotron-3-5-lightning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/nemotron-3-5-lightning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill