MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 42.8% less intelligence, 38.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 86.9% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.3 | 26.5 | −42.8% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 42.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $206.66 | $286.07 | +38.4% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 38.4% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 48.29s | 6.35s | −86.9% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 86.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
MiMo-V2.6-ProNemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill