MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi or Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 27.2% less intelligence, 546.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 24.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.3 | 33.7 | −27.2% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 27.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $206.66 | $1,336.09 | +546.5% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 6.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 48.29s | 60.10s | +24.5% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 24.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
MiMo-V2.6-ProQwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/qwen3-8-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/qwen3-8-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill