MiniMax-M2.7 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: MiniMax-M2.7 by MiniMax or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M2.7 scores 13.9 points higher (22.8 vs 8.9) but costs 3.8× as much to run the benchmark ($243 vs $63.7; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick MiniMax-M2.7 when you need intelligence above 8.9, and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoni… when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | MiniMax-M2.7 | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.8 | 8.9 | −61.0% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 61.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $243.38 | $63.74 | −73.8% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 73.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 53.54s | 10.29s | −80.8% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 80.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.05 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2.7: 61.0% less intelligence, 73.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 80.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiniMax-M2.7 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
MiniMax-M2.7NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m2-7/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m2-7/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill