MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: MiniMax-M2.7 by MiniMax or Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M2.7 scores 10.1 points higher (22.8 vs 12.7) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($243 vs $234; both mid-range class). Pick MiniMax-M2.7 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning).
| Metric | MiniMax-M2.7 | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.8 | 12.7 | −44.3% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 44.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $243.38 | $233.56 | −4.0% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 4.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 53.54s | 22.73s | −57.5% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 57.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.23 / $2.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2.7: 44.3% less intelligence, 4.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 57.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiniMax-M2.7 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
MiniMax-M2.7Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m2-7/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m2-7/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill