MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash scores 25.2 points higher (42.7 vs 17.5) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($283 vs $146; both mid-range class). Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Glimmer (High).
| Metric | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.7 | 17.5 | −59.0% Muse Glimmer (High) is 59.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $283.18 | $145.77 | −48.5% Muse Glimmer (High) is 48.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.52s | 24.79s | +5.4% Muse Glimmer (High) is 5.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash: 59.0% less intelligence, 48.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 5.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMuse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3-1-flash/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3-1-flash/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill