MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax or Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash: 7.3% less intelligence, 389.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 3.1% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.7 | 39.6 | −7.3% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 7.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $283.18 | $1,385.40 | +389.2% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 4.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 22.73s | 22.03s | −3.1% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 3.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMuse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3-1-flash/muse-spark-1-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3-1-flash/muse-spark-1-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill