MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Qwen3 Coder Next vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash: 78.5% less intelligence, 43.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 74.0% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.7 | 9.2 | −78.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 78.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $283.18 | $405.10 | +43.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 43.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.93s | 6.22s | −74.0% Qwen3 Coder Next is 74.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
MiniMax-M3.1-FlashQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3-1-flash/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3-1-flash/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill