MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Solar Mini 4
Which is better for the money: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax or Solar Mini 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Solar Mini 4 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash: 43.6% less intelligence, 77.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 14.8% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Solar Mini 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.7 | 24.1 | −43.6% Solar Mini 4 is 43.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $283.18 | $502.02 | +77.3% Solar Mini 4 is 77.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.93s | 27.46s | +14.8% Solar Mini 4 is 14.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $0.10 / $0.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Solar Mini 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
MiniMax-M3.1-FlashSolar Mini 4Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3-1-flash/solar-mini4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3-1-flash/solar-mini4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill