MiniMax-M3 vs Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: MiniMax-M3 by MiniMax or Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) scores 4.5 points higher (33.7 vs 29.2) but costs 3.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1737 vs $538; both premium class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 29.2, and MiniMax-M3 when 29.2 is enough.
| Metric | MiniMax-M3 | Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.2 | 33.7 | +15.4% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 15.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $537.98 | $1,737.18 | +222.9% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 3.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.47s | 20.40s | −19.9% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 19.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs MiniMax-M3: 15.4% more intelligence, 222.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 19.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiniMax-M3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
MiniMax-M3Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3/muse-spark-1-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3/muse-spark-1-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill