MiniMax-M3 vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: MiniMax-M3 by MiniMax or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 23.2 points higher (52.4 vs 29.2) but costs 11× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $538; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 29.2, and MiniMax-M3 when 29.2 is enough.
| Metric | MiniMax-M3 | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.2 | 52.4 | +79.5% Muse Wonder (Max) is 79.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $537.98 | $5,786.78 | +975.6% Muse Wonder (Max) is 11× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.47s | 40.70s | +59.8% Muse Wonder (Max) is 59.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs MiniMax-M3: 79.5% more intelligence, 975.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 59.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiniMax-M3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
MiniMax-M3Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill