MiniMax-M3 vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: MiniMax-M3 by MiniMax or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M3 scores 4.0 points higher (29.2 vs 25.2) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($538 vs $428; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick MiniMax-M3 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.7 Plus.
| Metric | MiniMax-M3 | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.2 | 25.2 | −13.7% Qwen3.7 Plus is 13.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $537.98 | $427.73 | −20.5% Qwen3.7 Plus is 20.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.47s | 46.21s | +81.4% Qwen3.7 Plus is 81.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs MiniMax-M3: 13.7% less intelligence, 20.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 81.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiniMax-M3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
MiniMax-M3Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill