Mistral Large 4 (Medium) vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: Mistral Large 4 (Medium) by Mistral or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-29.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 (Medium) scores 16.8 points higher (23.1 vs 6.3) but costs 5.1× as much to run the benchmark ($936 vs $182; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Large 4 (Medium) when you need intelligence above 6.3, and Muse Glimmer (High) when 6.3 is enough.
| Metric | Mistral Large 4 (Medium) | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 23.1 | 6.3 | −72.7% Muse Glimmer (High) is 72.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $936.36 | $181.95 | −80.6% Muse Glimmer (High) is 80.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 25.07s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.70 / $2.10 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs Mistral Large 4 (Medium): 72.7% less intelligence, 80.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Large 4 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.30 for $718.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 29.60 for $121.
Mistral Large 4 (Medium)Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4-medium/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4-medium/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill