Mistral Large 4 (Medium) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Mistral Large 4 (Medium) by Mistral or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-29.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 20.2 points higher (43.3 vs 23.1) but costs 5.8× as much to run the benchmark ($5414 vs $936; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 23.1, and Mistral Large 4 (Medium) when 23.1 is enough.
| Metric | Mistral Large 4 (Medium) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 23.1 | 43.3 | +87.4% Muse Wonder (Max) is 87.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $936.36 | $5,414.45 | +478.2% Muse Wonder (Max) is 5.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 40.64s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.70 / $2.10 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Mistral Large 4 (Medium): 87.4% more intelligence, 478.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Large 4 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.30 for $718.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 57.00 for $4766.
Mistral Large 4 (Medium)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4-medium/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4-medium/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill