Mistral Large 4 Preview vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-29.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 Preview scores 11.7 points higher (25.3 vs 13.6) but costs 6.1× as much to run the benchmark ($2923 vs $482; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Large 4 Preview when you need intelligence above 13.6, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when 13.6 is enough.
| Metric | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.3 | 13.6 | −46.2% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 46.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,923.39 | $482.18 | −83.5% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 83.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.54s | 6.43s | −74.8% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 74.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.70 / $2.10 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Mistral Large 4 Preview: 46.2% less intelligence, 83.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 74.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.50 for $1124.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.10 for $389.
Mistral Large 4 PreviewNemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4-preview/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4-preview/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill