Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Mistral Medium 3.5 by Mistral or Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) scores 19.5 points higher (33.7 vs 14.2) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1737 vs $1264; both premium class). Pick Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Mistral Medium 3.5.
| Metric | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.2 | 33.7 | +137.3% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 2.4× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,263.80 | $1,737.18 | +37.5% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 37.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.85s | 21.59s | +21.0% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 21.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $7.50 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs Mistral Medium 3.5: 137.3% more intelligence, 37.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 21.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Mistral Medium 3.5Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-medium-3-5/muse-spark-1-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-medium-3-5/muse-spark-1-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill