Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Mistral Medium 3.5 by Mistral or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 38.2 points higher (52.4 vs 14.2) but costs 4.6× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $1264; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 14.2, and Mistral Medium 3.5 when 14.2 is enough.
| Metric | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.2 | 52.4 | +269.0% Muse Wonder (Max) is 3.7× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,263.80 | $5,786.78 | +357.9% Muse Wonder (Max) is 4.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.90s | 46.63s | +160.5% Muse Wonder (Max) is 160.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $7.50 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Mistral Medium 3.5: 269.0% more intelligence, 357.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 160.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Mistral Medium 3.5Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-medium-3-5/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-medium-3-5/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill