Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: Mistral Medium 3.5 by Mistral or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max scores 26.0 points higher (40.2 vs 14.2) but costs 2.5× as much to run the benchmark ($3172 vs $1264; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Qwen3.8 Max when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Mistral Medium 3.5.
| Metric | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.2 | 40.2 | +183.1% Qwen3.8 Max is 2.8× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,263.80 | $3,172.37 | +151.0% Qwen3.8 Max is 2.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.85s | 64.17s | +259.5% Qwen3.8 Max is 259.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $7.50 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 Max vs Mistral Medium 3.5: 183.1% more intelligence, 151.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 259.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Mistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-medium-3-5/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-medium-3-5/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill