Mistral Small 3.1 vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: Mistral Small 3.1 by Mistral or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Glimmer (High) scores 10.4 points higher (17.5 vs 7.1) but costs 5.2× as much to run the benchmark ($146 vs $27.8; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Glimmer (High) when you need intelligence above 7.1, and Mistral Small 3.1 when 7.1 is enough.
| Metric | Mistral Small 3.1 | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 7.1 | 17.5 | +146.5% Muse Glimmer (High) is 2.5× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $27.82 | $145.77 | +424.0% Muse Glimmer (High) is 5.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.78s | 24.78s | +110.4% Muse Glimmer (High) is 110.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.08 / $0.14 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs Mistral Small 3.1: 146.5% more intelligence, 424.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 110.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Small 3.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Mistral Small 3.1Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-small-3-1/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-small-3-1/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill