Mistral Small 3.1 vs Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Mistral Small 3.1 by Mistral or Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) scores 14.3 points higher (21.4 vs 7.1) but costs 41× as much to run the benchmark ($1145 vs $27.8; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) when you need intelligence above 7.1, and Mistral Small 3.1 when 7.1 is enough.
| Metric | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 7.1 | 21.4 | +201.4% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 3.0× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $27.82 | $1,145.36 | +4017.0% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 41× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.95s | 110.87s | +912.5% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 912.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.08 / $0.14 | $0.60 / $3.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) vs Mistral Small 3.1: 201.4% more intelligence, 4017.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 912.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Small 3.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Mistral Small 3.1Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-small-3-1/qwen3-6-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-small-3-1/qwen3-6-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill