Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) vs Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) by Mistral or Muse Ember (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Ember (Xhigh) scores 29.8 points higher (34.1 vs 4.3) but costs 2.2× as much to run the benchmark ($95.7 vs $43.4; mid-range vs budget cost classes). Pick Muse Ember (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning).
| Metric | Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) | Muse Ember (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 4.3 | 34.1 | +693.0% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 7.9× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $43.43 | $95.73 | +120.4% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 2.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.49s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Ember (Xhigh) vs Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning): 693.0% more intelligence, 120.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) scores 18.60 for $39.6.
- Muse Ember (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Muse Ember (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-small-4/muse-ember-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-small-4/muse-ember-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill