Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) by Mistral or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Glimmer (High) scores 6.2 points higher (17.5 vs 11.3) but costs 3.4× as much to run the benchmark ($146 vs $42.5; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Glimmer (High) when you need intelligence above 11.3, and Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) when 11.3 is enough.
| Metric | Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.3 | 17.5 | +54.9% Muse Glimmer (High) is 54.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $42.50 | $145.77 | +243.0% Muse Glimmer (High) is 3.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.50s | 24.76s | +70.8% Muse Glimmer (High) is 70.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning): 54.9% more intelligence, 243.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 70.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-small-4/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-small-4/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill