Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) by Mistral or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Plus scores 13.9 points higher (25.2 vs 11.3) but costs 10× as much to run the benchmark ($428 vs $42.5; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Plus when you need intelligence above 11.3, and Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) when 11.3 is enough.
| Metric | Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.3 | 25.2 | +123.0% Qwen3.7 Plus is 2.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $42.50 | $427.73 | +906.4% Qwen3.7 Plus is 10× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.45s | 46.20s | +219.7% Qwen3.7 Plus is 219.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning): 123.0% more intelligence, 906.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 219.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-small-4/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-small-4/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill